Public Space Planning

common go into provides the grounds for cities to be seen and experienced. Whether it is a squargon, a market, or a park, unrestricted space in cities has been noted as the shopping center where ideas argon exchanged, city indistinguishability element is built and citizenship is learned (Carr et al. , 1992 Low, 2000 Goodsell, 2003). Such places atomic number 18 important and even necessary for citizens to lie with a good quality of brio and well-being (Relph, 1993). Historically, globe places have play an important role in cities in galore(postnominal) cultures.Public spaces such as the classical agora, Spanish plaza, and colonial town forthright provided a place for markets, celebrations and polite deportment to flourish (Carr et al. , 1992). In modern cities human beings spaces play many diverse roles they are sites of recreation, scotch development, consumption and community they mob shape as plazas, parks and urban entertainment areas they mean many things to many people and can establish an identity for a neighborhood or a city at large. Public spaces, in any incarnation, are important to civic life (Goodsell, 2003).While we may have a good fellow feeling of why usual spaces are important in cities, what is facilitate largely unknown is how the cookery work out itself contri merelyes to the development of these important places. In appurtenance to understanding the role of public spaces in cities today, the means of public space creation, the profound interests, processes, and motivations involved with their construction, must excessively be scrutinized and better understood in post to come to a full understanding of how public spaces make their desired aims.Two solecism studies were chosen to illustrate approaches to public space planning Torontos Yonge Dundas strong and the urban center of Mississaugas city Centre Parks. These sites were chosen because of their similarities and also because of their differences. Both s ites were intended to achieve similar goals of creating a sense of place and creating new opportunities for economic development in their cities. Their efforts, though, are taking place in very disparate contexts and employ different planning approaches.In Mississauga, a rapidly ripening city with a developing downtown core, a placemaking process featuring public workshops and lag training was apply. In the Yonge Dundas Square example, situated at one of Torontos past commercial nodes, a public-private partnership was used to achieve the goals of the barf. In addition, the cases are also at different stages in their development. The Mississauga figure has only completed its initial visioning and forward design stages while the Yonge Dundas Square project is nearing completion.In choosing these disparate cases, I was able to look the strengths and weaknesses of different styles of public space planning. Specifically, these cases allowed me to ask differences between what seemed to be a tightly controlled planning process in Yonge Dundas Square and a seemly very public planning process in Mississauga. Ultimately, the equation of these cases helped me to elicit relevant criticisms and policy recommendations for planners of public space, regardless of the process they are works within.Through research about these case studies, report informant interviews and in-depth analysis of planning documents and relevant literature this report presents a limited review of public space planning processes just in the context of Yonge Dundas Square and the City Centre Parks. While having goals that use the spoken language of sense of place, the planning processes employed are to a greater extent effective in military service the economic goals of the projects. Because socio-cultural goals like sense of place are defined broadly and train over time, the planning process does short(p) to directly address them.Ultimately this report suggests that socio-cultura l goals like sense of place should not be removed as a goal of public space planning, but rather, the planning process should attempt to reconcile economic and socio-cultural goals. By increasing awareness of the greatness of the socio-cultural function of public space finished educational outreach to developers and the public at large, as well as by incorporating socio-cultural goals into semipermanent strategic plans and mission statements, municipalities can more effectively create public spaces that are not only economically strong, but also socially important to their citizens.